Last month, when health officials reported they discovered a pathogenic connection between raw milk from a Pennsylvania dairy and two illnesses in 2014 — one in California and the other in Florida — a wave of disbelief and condemnation began rippling out from the raw milk community. News stories about the announcement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sparked a flurry of online comments from raw milk drinkers and producers who disparaged the government’s science and scientists. A common thread through many of the posts was disbelief that laboratory analysis could actually prove the pathogen samples from the two patients and the dairy were the same strain of Listeria monocytogenes. Raw milk advocates questioned why the CDC said only that the samples were “closely related genetically” and that Miller’s Organic Farm in Pennsylvania was the “likely source.” Conspiracy theories about a big government agenda to destroy the raw milk industry emerged as fans of unpasteurized raw dairy products questioned why a specific dairy was being targeted when the CDC would not definitively state their lab analysis was 100 percent correct. Two million base pairs can’t be wrong The CDC used whole genome sequencing (WGS) to analyze the DNA of the Listeria from a sample of Miller’s Organic Farm raw milk. That DNA fingerprint of “about 2 million base pairs” was then fed into the PulseNet database, said Matthew Wise, the Outbreak Response Team Lead in CDC’s Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases. The database already included the DNA fingerprints from the Listeria monocytogenes that sickened the California and Florida patients. When the CDC scientists added the database and ran a search for matches, the connection was discovered.
The Listeria Whole Genome Sequencing Project, launched in September 2013, had cracked the DNA code on about 2,300 isolates by February 2015, according to the CDC’s project website. State laboratories, the CDC, the Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information are collaborating on the project. “What we eat and how we eat in the United States has changed. In the early 1900s, most food was consumed close to where it was produced. Food safety gaps were usually discovered only when groups of people in the same location became ill, such as picnics or schools,” according to the CDC’s website. “In the last half-century, food production has become increasingly centralized, and food products are often transported great distances before arriving at our dinner tables. Illnesses caused by errors in food production can sicken people over a wide area and may not be recognized as a problem in any one community.” Before technology advances made whole genome sequencing (WGS) fast and affordable, the CDC and FDA mostly relied on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) molecular typing to identify foodborne pathogens. The CDC’s Wise said PFGE was helpful, but not even in the same ballpark as WGS in terms of detecting or investigating foodborne illness outbreaks. He said some Salmonella, for example, have PFGE results that are very similar when the Salmonella isn’t related and vice versa. “WGS gives us more certainty that two isolates are the same,” Wise said. “And it shows us more than PFGE, such as antibiotic resistance. WGS is altering the landscape of foodborne outbreak investigation. It’s an incredible toe hold for investigators.” The value of WGS had already been proven As more isolates of pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli and Salmonella are decoded by WGS, the more connections between seemingly unrelated illnesses will be discovered, Wise said. The WGS technique helped detect a Listeria outbreak in 2014 linked to caramel apples. In that outbreak, 35 people in 12 states contracted listeriosis from eating caramel apples. Seven people died. Ultimately the California apple grower-shipper who supplied the apples recalled its entire crop of galas and granny smiths, which health officials say reduced the number of people who got sick. In 2015, WGS connected 24 illnesses reaching back to 2010. The source was found to be soft cheeses produced by Karoun Dairies of San Fernando, CA. “Suddenly, we went from just a few cases … to upwards of 20,” epidemiologist Brenda Jackson told Food Safety News in 2015. “Once we had those numbers, it was fairly easy to see that there was a signal for soft cheese.” Whole genome sequencing also helped investigators with the 2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak in Europe, which prompted a rapid scientific response.
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)