The meat industry may still be waiting on the World Trade Organization to make a call on country-of-origin labeling (COOL), but in the meantime they’ve lost another round in their fight against the rule in the D.C. Circuit courts. COOL laws mandate that meat products be labeled to tell where the food animals were born, raised and slaughtered. The American Meat Institute (AMI) has challenged the laws in U.S. courts on behalf of meat producers in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Writing the majority opinion, U.S. Circuit Judge Stephen Williams said that the interest of providing consumers with information overcame claims of free speech raised by AMI. Tuesday’s decision by a split court of 11 judges reinforced an earlier decision made by a panel of three. “The court’s decision today is disappointing,” said AMI Interim President and CEO James H. Hodges in a statement. “We have maintained all along that the country of origin rule harms livestock producers and the industry and affords little benefit to consumers. This decision will perpetuate those harms. We will evaluate our options moving forward.” Consumer groups, on the other hand, celebrated the decision. “We applaud the D.C. Circuit decision, which is an important victory for the U.S. public’s right to know how their food is produced,” said George Kimbrell, senior attorney at the Center for Food Safety. “The Court confirmed that manufacturers do not have the right to avoid basic factual disclosures about their food products.” The COOL law was adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in May 2013, but enforcement of the rule is still developing. Canada and Mexico have both filed complaints to the World Trade Organization on COOL. A decision from the organization is still pending.
The News Desk team at Food Safety News covers breaking developments, regulatory updates, recalls, and key topics shaping food safety today. These articles are produced collaboratively by our editorial staff.
New directives from the USDA on the voluntary claim “Product of USA” include a significant change from past guidance.
The new guidelines double down on the requirement that producers making
Oregon wanted FSIS to allow state establishments — located in states operating under a cooperative agreement with FSIS to enforce requirements “at least equal to” federal requirements — to slaughter or process amenable species for subsequent use at federal establishments within the same state.
A federal judge in West Virginia has temporarily blocked the state’s ban on artificial dyes in foods before it can take effect, granting a request from an industry group.
A draft food law that includes mandatory allergen labeling and a licensing system for businesses has been proposed in Jersey.
The planned regulations are being reviewed by the Environment, Housing,
Tri-Union Seafoods is cautioning consumers that a third-party distributor inadvertently released quarantined product that was associated with a February 2025 recall.
The initial recall was conducted following notification from the
Left Coast Organics brand organic chia seeds have been recalled in Canada because of Salmonella contamination.
The chia seeds were distributed in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Saskatchewan, according
Suzanna’s Kitchen of Norcross, GA, is recalling 13,720 pounds of ready- to-eat grilled chicken breast fillet products that may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, the USDA’s Food
The Ambriola Company is recalling select cheese products, including some Boar’s Head brand cheese, after routine testing confirmed the presence of Listeria monocytogenes.
No illnesses have been reported to
