Thirty-three U.S. senators from livestock states, including Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) and Thad Cochran (R-MS), chairwoman and ranking member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, on Tuesday sent a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk urging him to “quickly address” Russia’s recent ban on all U.S. beef, pork and turkey over residues of ractopamine, an animal drug used to boost growth and leanness. The senators called the trade restriction, which jeopardizes more than half a billion dollars in U.S. exports, an “egregious trade barrier with no scientific merit” and accused Russia of violating World Trade Organization rules. “With your swift action and use of all enforcement tools available, it is our sincere hope that the issues surrounding Russia’s import ban can be quickly and decisively resolved thereby ensuring a stable and predictable trading environment for U.S. livestock producers and exporters,” read the letter. The letter argues that Russia’s zero tolerance for ractopamine residues is inconsistent with the WTO’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement and is “in practice, an import ban,” in large part because the UN’s Codex Alimentarius Commission recently recognized a safe maximum residue limit. With an MRL set at Codex, a zero tolerance ban goes against the international standard usually used to settle WTO disputes. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of ractopamine for pigs in 1999, and later approved the drug as a feed additive for cattle and turkeys. More than two dozen other countries, including Australia and Canada, have since approved the drug as safe for food animals and for human consumption at very low levels. “The United States must do everything it can to defend its rights in both the WTO and CODEX and prevent non-science-based trading practices from other trading partners, including Russia,” continued the letter, which included Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA),  Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA). “Further, we must demonstrate to Russia that its newfound commitment to WTO membership includes adherence to science-based standards, such as the CODEX MRL for ractopamine.” Hours after the letter was announced, Reuters reported China will soon require third party certification confirming that U.S. pork imports are ractopamine-free. Joe Shuele of the Meat Export Federation told Reuters that Chinese regulatory authorities suggested the requirement could kick in March 1, even though exporters have been meeting Chinese requirements after a serious of temporary bans were sparked by ractopamine positives. “China has a zero-tolerance (ractopamine) requirement for pork,” noted Shuele. “The issue is how do you satisfy the third-party verification requirement when U.S. pork is already ractopamine free.” As Food Safety News has reported, China and the European Union, which together produce and consume the majority of the world’s pork, have been ardent opponents of ractopamine: “China has expressed concerns about the higher concentrations of ractopamine residues found in pig organs, which can be part of a traditional Chinese diet, and the EU has argued that the science backing the drug’s safety is flawed. In 2009, the European Food Safety Authority published a 52-page report strongly criticizing the data and methodology used by Codex to calculate the Acceptable Daily Intake for ractopamine, upon which the ractopamine residue standards are based.”

  • Oginikwe

    These senators would be better off urging farmers to stop using ractopamine and give their customers what they want.

     

    The effects of ractopamine on the behavior and physiology
    of finishing pigs – Journal
    of Animal Science, 2003

    Effects of a “step-up” ractopamine feeding program, sex,
    and social rank on growth performance, hoof lesions and Enterobacteriaceae
    shedding in finishing pigs – Journal
    of Animal Science, 2008

    Behavior and peripheral amine concentrations in relation
    to ractopamine feeding, sex and social rank of finishing pigs – Journal
    of Animal Science, 2009

    Aggressiveness and brain amine concentration
    in dominant and subordinate finishing pigs fed the β-adrenoreceptor
    agonist ractopamine – The Journal of Animal Science, 2010

    “Why
    Ractopamine Increases Aggressive Behavior” July
    14 2010

    So many drugs, so little time
    CVM ADE Comprehensive Clinical Detail Report Listing:
    http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/ProductSafetyInformation/UCM055411.pdf

    From:

    Ractopamine and Pigs: Looking at the Numbers (FERN)
    2/23/2012: http://thefern.org/2012/02/ractopamine-and-pigs-looking-at-the-numbers/

  •  Take a page out of the organic manual- give the customer exactly what they want, and charge a premium for it.  Further, if it is because Russia wants to effect a trade ban, do the same. Tell China no more lead in toys or dog food:P  We are a huge market for Russia for petroleum products, fish, shellfish, and iron products. We have a trade deficit with them as well (2006 it was nearly double). Up our import standards of their goods too.

  • mc685

    Any country should have the right to have zero tolerance on drugs and other chemical additives that are used in the food system.  Who are we to tell them they have to agree to this so we can sell our product!  We instead should be focusing on our own food industry standards.  Let the the industry change to meet the desires of the consumers.  If they don’t have anyone to sell to, they will change. The government needs to stop interfering.  Personally, I agree with Russia….I would rather not have this stuff, either, in the food that I eat.  

  • Ivyleaguer

    Oh, is that why a turkey costs between 30-50 dollars?  Gone are the birds of yore that could be had by all families on holidays.  Perhaps Europe and China’s bans on tainted foods are a better idea for us consumers than the food corporations  would have us think.