Sponsors of New Jersey Raw Milk Bill Start Over
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »The Northeast Dairy Foods Association, Inc., located in Syracuse, NY represents dairy product processors, manufacturers and distributors in the northeast U.S. including New Jersey. Our association is opposed to all sales of raw milk for consumption to the general public. We call for the repeal of all laws that allow the sale of raw milk to the general public in all northeast U.S. states that currently allow it.
Our association believes selling raw milk is a public health safety threat. Sales of raw milk only leads to negative PR; reduces confidence in the public's eye towards all dairy products when there is a raw milk sickness outbreak and decreases consumption and production of milk on farms that do not sell raw milk.
Raw milk is dangerous and should not be allowed to be sold to the public. Our association will again oppose any efforts in the 8 northeast states that attempt to increase and further allow the sale of raw milk.
We call on all health professionals, members of food science academia and legitimate dairy industry representatives to assist and help push back this effort to allow raw milk sales to be sold to the general public which poses a true and real health threat.
the sale of raw milk "poses a true and real health threat" ... compared to what?! Dr Beals' work is the closest you'll come to actuarial tables : he says that consuming raw milk is 35,000 times LESS risky than any other foodstuff in commerce
Bruce W Krupke's comment exemplifies Herbert Spencer's maxim : "there is a principle which is a bar against all information, proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance... that principle is, contempt prior to investigation"
“reduces confidence in the public's eye towards all dairy products when there is a raw milk sickness outbreak and decreases consumption and production of milk on farms that do not sell raw milk.”
So what happens when pasteurized milk is linked to sickness and death?
As is this example: Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes Infections Associated with Pasteurized Milk from a Local Dairy – Massachusetts, 2007 From CDC's MMWR: On November 27, 2007, a local health officer in central Massachusetts contacted the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) to report listeriosis in a man aged 87 years. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) performed on the patient's Listeria monocytogenes isolate produced a pattern indistinguishable from that of isolates from three other cases identified in residents of central Massachusetts in June, October, and early November 2007. MDPH, in collaboration with local public health officials, conducted an investigation, which implicated pasteurized, flavored and nonflavored, fluid milk produced by a local dairy (dairy A) as the source of the outbreak. This report summarizes the results of that investigation. In all, five cases were identified, and three deaths occurred. This outbreak illustrates the potential for contamination of fluid milk products after pasteurization and the difficulty in detecting outbreaks of L. monocytogenes infections.
And this example: Massive outbreak of antimicrobial-resistant salmonellosis traced to pasteurized milk
C. A. Ryan et al., JAMA. Vol. 258 No. 22, December 11, 1987
Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
Two waves of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella typhimurium infections in Illinois totaling over 16 000 culture-confirmed cases were traced to two brands of pasteurized 2% milk produced by a single dairy plant. Salmonellosis was associated with taking antimicrobials before onset of illness. Two surveys to determine the number of persons who were actually affected yielded estimates of 168,791 and 197,581 persons, making this the largest outbreak of salmonellosis ever identified in the United States. The epidemic strain was easily identified because it had a rare antimicrobial resistance pattern and a highly unusual plasmid profile; study of stored isolates showed it had caused clusters of salmonellosis during the previous ten months that may have been related to the same plant, suggesting that the strain had persisted in the plant and repeatedly contaminated milk after pasteurization.
Make it simple, corporate America is choosing profit over principle, raw milk sales will not effect your bottom line, I do not drink pasteurized milk anyway, so you will not be losing me or my family as customers. I notice that disease management is still big business, so when you feed cows corn, you need big pharma and it's drugs to keep the cows alive, not healthy, but alive. Fools, you would'nt know good food if it hit you in the mouth!
Bruce Krupke, you could care less about public safety. Because it is impossible for factory farms such as those owned by your members to produce raw milk, you simply don't want ANYONE to have it. The truth is that your factory-farmed milk contains blood and feces due to disgusting conditions, and it MUST BE pasteurized to make it safe to drink. Your factory farms simply CANNOT COMPETE with clean raw milk farmers.
I grew up on raw milk as did milions of people befoe greed took over the food industry. Does anyone think that a farmer would do anything to hurt is bottom line of getting 3 times the amount of money from customers than the govt gives to factory farms for their milk? The customer must be able to make the choice based upon their own knowledge of the source, they are not stupid as the govt thinks we are. If we were allowed to see the way factory farms produce and work with our food system there would be a revolt bigger than what is happening now. yes there will be isolated problems, but they wil not affect thousands of people as when there are problems with factory farms.