Study Suggests Less Salmonella in Organic Chicken
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Science & Research »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Science & Research »The study is linked in the first paragraph of the article. Unfortunately, you must subscribe in order to have access to it. Feel free to contact Dr. Walid Q. Alali at the Center for Food Safety at the University of Georgia for any questions you may have. His email address is walali@uga.edu.
From the study abstract: "Salmonella prevalences in fecal samples were 5.6% (10/180) and 38.8% (93/240) from organic and conventional farms, respectively. From feed, 5.0% (3/60) and 27.5% (22/80) of the samples were positive for Salmonella from organic and conventional farms, respectively. None of the water samples were positive for Salmonella."
Over 1/4 of feed samples delivered to conventional farms were salmonella positive, wow! Some reckless feed supplier is really taking these chicken farmers to the cleaners.
Interesting (and not surprising) that fecal results mirror feed results so closely.
Suggests that contaminated feed can be a potent source of salmonella in these operations when no one's 'watching the hen house' and illustrates why HACCP, when applied diligently can be preventative in situations like this.
Interesting little field survey. Thanks for passing this citation along.
I look forward to reading this paper. Most interesting to me is the lack of recognition that smaller farms provide useful data (ref. last paragraph). True, is is difficult to find exact treatment replications at small farms, but are statistics supplanting actual safety? Where are the peer reviewed studies on preventing disease by not requiring chickens to wading in their own feces all day. Studying small farms may not serve the interest of the BigAg producers, but why do they get to choose the definition of "organic" production. Small farms provide regional economic benefits, often at lower environmental cost. They should not have to compete at the frankinclucker price point. ef