Header graphic for print

Food Safety News

Breaking news for everyone's consumption

Why the Meat Industry Sells Salmonella

As a lawyer who writes about food policy, one of my biggest frustrations is how reporters often get the law wrong, or omit critical pieces of information.

meatseller-featured.jpg

Last week the latest massive food safety recall hit the news – 36 million pounds of ground turkey possibly tainted with Salmonella, courtesy of meat giant Cargill.

While some media outlets were asking good questions about why it took the federal government so long to release such vital information (problems began in March), others reported that it’s currently legal to sell Salmonella-tainted meat.

While the meat industry might like it that way, that’s not the entire story.

For example, the Associated Press reported incorrectly: “Because salmonella is so common in poultry, it is not illegal for meat to be tainted with the pathogen.” And the New York Times reported that “it is not illegal to sell meat contaminated with salmonella” but didn’t go into any detail.

Over at Wired, outbreak expert Maryn McKenna wrote a very good article, “Resistant Salmonella: Deadly Yet Somehow Not Illegal” that described the importance of the federal government declaring a bug such as Salmonella an “adulterant” – the legal term for a substance that is unsafe, making the food illegal to sell: “Declaring an organism an adulterant doesn’t only make it illegal for food producers to distribute. It also imposes a duty on federal food-safety agencies to detect its presence in food so as to prevent its distribution.”

This explains why the meat industry hates the very idea of having its products declared adulterated, and why it’s done everything it can to stop the federal government from doing so. That part of the story the media left out.

Why Can’t USDA Just Follow the Law?

Back in 1994, in the wake of the Jack in the Box outbreak, USDA showed some backbone by declaring the 0157:H7 strain of E. coli an adulterant, thus putting into motion mandatory testing, which has likely saved countless lives.

While that was certainly the right thing to do at the time, it now seems an unintended consequence was to set up the expectation that each bug must be declared an adulterant one at a time. But this cannot be what Congress intended when it drafted the inspection laws that USDA operates under. Indeed, the plain language of the two relevant statutes suggests otherwise.

Both the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act define meat or poultry as adulterated “if it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health.” Sounds pretty straightforward: Salmonella a poisonous substance? Check. Salmonella injurious to health? Check again. But somehow in the tangled web of Washington D.C. clearly written laws with are never that simple. Enter meat industry lawyers.

Legal Maneuvering to Block USDA 

As Food Safety News publisher Bill Marler explained in his recent post, it’s important to know your legal history to give these outbreaks their proper context.

In 1999, the U.S. Department of Agriculture attempted to shut down a meat plant (Supreme Beef Processors) that failed numerous tests for Salmonella in ground beef. Instead of cleaning up its act, Supreme Beef sued USDA, claiming the agency overstepped its legal authority. The appeals court, in a twisted decision, agreed with industry, finding that because the meat came into the plant already contaminated as “raw material,” USDA had no jurisdiction to declare it adulterated, thereby invalidating the agency’s performance standards.

As former head of food safety at USDA Richard Raymond told me earlier, this court decision, “set food safety back decades,” and helps explain why USDA to this day is so cautious when it comes to expanding its authority.

Cautious is what just got us at least one death and 78 illnesses in 26 states. Of course, these figures are much lower than the reality as most food-borne illnesses go unreported. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that Salmonella illnesses occur on the order of 30 times the number reported, which for this outbreak means potentially more than 2,200 cases.

Meanwhile, even before this outbreak, the most recent CDC data showed that while E. coli 0157 illnesses are in decline (remember, this is the only organism officially declared an adulterant by USDA – -no coincidence there), Salmonella cases have actually increased. Last year’s incidence of Salmonella infections was nearly three times the federal government’s health target — causing a whopping 1.2 million illnesses annually.

Making matters even worse, this Cargill brand of Salmonella is showing resistance to antibiotics, demonstrating once again the insanity of routine treatment of farm animals with antibiotics. (For that angle see the Wired piece.)

How did the meat industry get so powerful that it can keep USDA from doing its job? Now, instead of preventing illnesses from occurring by requiring testing with teeth, we have USDA regulations that are so lax they allow almost half the samples tested at ground turkey plants to be contaminated with Salmonella — a pretty easy standard to meet. And one that allowed this outbreak to occur.

Cargill’s Pathetic Response – Consumer Education

So what does Cargill have to say for itself? From a press release: “It is regrettable that people may have become ill from eating one of our ground turkey products and, for anyone who did, we are truly sorry.”

honeysucklechub-internal.jpg

Sounds like defense-lawyer speak. Using the passive voice, “it is regrettable” but not taking responsibility with the more direct “we regret.” And “may have become ill”- to be sure not to admit any fault despite ample evidence it was their meat. Worst of all, the dismissive “for anyone who did, we are truly sorry,” is offensive to families whose loved ones have real names, and aren’t just “anyone.”

But wait, there’s more. Cargill also helpfully tells us:

We all need to remember bacteria is everywhere, and we must properly handle and prepare fresh foods wherever they are served. USDA food safety guidelines for safely handling and preparing food can be found on the USDA Internet website and serve as helpful food safety reminders.

Saying “bacteria is everywhere” is the meat industry’s usual way to deflect responsibility and place the entire burden on the consumer. (Ironically, most of the recalled products were labeled “All Natural,” showing how meaningless that term is.)

Fittingly, the industry that is busy leading consumers to USDA’s website is also the one we have to thank for reducing the agency to little more than a lame information resource.

Indeed, at the end of its own press release on the recall, USDA pointed consumers to “Ask Karen” – the agency’s “virtual representative” – an automated response system available 24/7.

I am sure Karen’s wisdom is reassuring to the hundreds and perhaps thousands of victims of this latest colossal food safety regulatory failure.

————————-

Michele Simon is a public health lawyer specializing in industry marketing and lobbying tactics. She is the author of Appetite for Profit: How the Food Industry Undermines Our Health and How to Fight Back, and research and policy director at Marin Institute, an alcohol industry watchdog group.

© Food Safety News
  • Doc Mudd

    Let’s clean up poultry meats…all of them (’cause they’re all proven risky the way they’re being processed and handled today).
    http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/07/study-food-safety-issues-at-dc-farmers-market/
    Just be sure to close all the loopholes…including for the “small producers”. They will greedily poison you with their overpriced “all natural” fool traps, too!

  • Mike Mychajlonka, Ph. D.

    If the FDA and USDA are being defunded thanks to Tea Party/Republican gamesmanship and they didn’t do all that much before, what is supposed to happen now? Should individual consumers have their own food tested, share the results among each other and report positives to the Feds? If they do so and find contaminants, will Cargill and other manufacturers then claim they are being slandered by the very consumers who are trying to protect themselves when they see the government can’t or won’t?

  • Minkpuppy

    There’s an old poultry industry saying that pretty much sums up the attitude towards poultry safety:
    “It’s just chicken! Relax!”
    When are they going to wake up and realize that chickens and turkeys can make you just as sick as any other meat?

  • Theresa Kentner

    Will this turn out to be the feed like the Salmonella Egg Recall in Iowa? It order to stop selling Salmonella, they may have to stop feeding it.

  • wewa

    How can the consumer take back control?
    Easy. Backyard farming.
    Grow your own eggs, fruits, veggies.
    Its no longer as hard as you think.
    Aquaponics on youtube.
    Japanese/Korean Natural Farming.
    Take care.

  • rock rothwell

    Exactly how might buying the product of Cargill or any other of the Mega Multinationals be anything less than Russian Roulette? And in light of their track record, Russian Roulette with 4 shells in a 6 shooter?
    Solution? Simple, just do what has been proven over the entire history of humanity. Buy local or do it yourself. Raising birds is not difficult. “Oh I can’t” you say, “I’m too busy” (working for the almighty dollar)…. In that case, you deserve exactly what you get. Buon a’ petit.