Commercial Raw Milk Sales Goal of Wisconsin Bill
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »Seriously people, do you not get it! You know the risks of raw milk, you've seen repeated outbreaks...yet you still want it to be legal? Let's also make it legal to sell ground beef that knowingly has ecoli O157:H7 present!
M-
I give the "raw milk is magic" argument about as much credence as the claim that buying Cheerios prevents heart attacks - so I don't buy it (raw milk OR the argument). Your comparison to selling it to knowingly distributing contaminated beef is invalid, though, because raw milk is almost never contaminated in a way that makes people sick (if that weren't true, there'd be a whole lot more sick hippies and foodies out there).
That said, what you choose to eat is an extremely personal decision, and is clearly in the realm of "Pursuit of Happiness"/"Right to Self-Determination", and should definitely be protected. Of course there's the argument that someone might give it to someone not aware of the risk, but there are a whole lot of ways that people harm each other, and you couldn't ban them all without turning the country into North Korea.
Most of these sites' readers hate hearing people say this, but there should be certified, and un-certified food. Federal, state and local governments would have no authority to regulate the un-certified food on the grounds of food safety. People that don't have the time or inclination to take the safety of their food into their own hands would stick to the certified stuff.
"...there should be certified, and un-certified food. Federal, state and local governments would have no authority to regulate the un-certified food on the grounds of food safety."
Yeah, we've pretty much accomplished this yuppie brainfart wishlist item with the Tester amendment to FSMA.
We now have the vast majority of food producers (albeit hideously inefficient producers of a miniscule fraction of our basic food supply) exempt from any bothersome food safety oversight or any annoying common sense suggestion.
These loopy headstrong 'small' food purveyors "don't have the time or inclination to take the safety of their food into their own hands", so they operate with no real traceability, no accountability - laissez le bon temps rouler!!
Laissez faire, carpe diem and caveat emptor, baby, caveat emptor!!
Melissa, You wrote: "Let's also make it legal to sell ground beef that knowingly has ecoli O157:H7 present!" That really is profoundly stupid. The parallel would be "Let's also make it legal to sell ground beef that has been tested and tested and tested." You need to see the evidence that Weston Smith presented. Yes, there is an extremely small chance of problems with raw milk, but there is a 100% chance of problems with over-processed foods, including cooked and homogenized milk.
It should be the people who are allowed to chose the type of milk they want to drink. If raw milk is really so dangerous then the people would stop drinking it. Should we allow freedom of choice in the country, yes we should. The people who are against raw milk are the people who have not tried it yet. Remember the human race has 8000 yrs of raw milk history and only ( 1940) and 70 years of the pasteurized stuff.
The problem isn't whether raw is better or cooked is better. Problem #1 is the opportunity for contamination at any of the transfer points: cow to milking machine, milking machine to farmer's collector, farmer's collector to milk truck, milk truck to processing center, processing center to bottle. Problem #2 is that many of the potential contaminants are not detectable by our ordinary human equipment (eyes, noses and tongues) but can be deadly! Cholera and typhoid outbreaks have been caused by contaminated raw milk, folks, and the consumers who bought these products had no idea until they got terribly sick. At what point do we say a product is simply too risky to be permitted on a commercial scale? Maybe on a small scale we say "ok" but only under these limited circumstances with warning labels, etc. From what I've read, this proposed Wisconsin law doesn't contain nearly enough safeguards to prevent some random consumer from drinking possibly contaminated product without knowing (much less accepting) the risks.
This seriously needs to be legalized and REGULATED as soon as possible to prevent the unregulated sale and transfer of raw milk.
Raw milk will be sold, bartered exchanged, and given away. Without proper regulation by the state, it will be consumed without proper safety mechanisms in place.
For now, Raw milk can be obtained from Michigan, Minnesota, and Illinois. They can't sell it here, but nobody is stopping me from supporting the sensible policies and farmers of our neighboring states.
If Wisconsin wants to remain the Dairy State, we need our politicians to remove their heads from their nether-regions and to remove the money given by producers of dead, white liquids masquerading as milk.