Full Year Passes with No Action on Catfish
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »Ms Hauter knows better than to call this a food safety issue. If it were truly a food safety issue, all imported fish and seafood would be under USDA inspection. There is no significant difference between the domestic raising of catfish and other fish and seafoods that we import from Asia. This was an amendment attached to the Farm Bill of 2008 that was promulgated by Senator Thad Cochran of the great Catfish raising state of Mississippi to protect his constituents.
Once this becomes finalized, if it ever is, we will have significant trade issues with Asia, and our beef, pork and poultry industries will be penalized by Asia while a very few domestic Catfish farmers will benefit, but only for awhile. This rule, if implemented, will be followed by another WTO action brought forth by China, and they will prevail, just as they did when Congress barred USDA from promulgating rules and regs that might have allowed China to export cooked chicken mear.
Congress is the last place we should look to to improve the safety of the US food supply. And Food and Water Watch should pick another battle to fight where they can truly take the high road. This road only leads to criticism and cynicism of the US Congress for the way they try to promote protectionism under the guise of food safety.
Could not agree more with Mr. Raymond, this is nothing but a thinly disguissed non tariff trade barrier that if implemented will have disastrous consequences. At a time that the US is looking to export markets for growth, the last thing we need is to start a trade war in order to benefit a few catfish farmers.