It is sad to report that the credibility of our results has been attacked. And by someone who knows nothing of the two scientists who oversaw the testing for us. There were no questions asked prior – just bashing. Makes one wonder. Phyllis Entis is probably known to many readers
Continue Reading Pet Food Safety Study is Not Junk Science
-->
-->
Susan Thixton
Portions of Pet Food Safety Study are the ‘Epitome of Junk Science’
By Phyllis Entis on
On March 31, 2013, I announced that I was “moving on,” and I ended my daily posts on eFoodAlert. Since then, I have been concentrating on my creative writing projects. Nevertheless, I’ve continued to monitor food safety stories, muttering under my breath from time to time about the quality…
Continue Reading Portions of Pet Food Safety Study are the ‘Epitome of Junk Science’
Consumer-Funded Test Finds 11 of 12 Pet Foods Contaminated
By James Andrews on
A number of pet food brands are contaminated with potentially harmful bacteria and other contaminants that could cause negative health effects to humans and their pets, according to a testing project funded by a group of pet owners and coordinated by the Association for Truth in Pet Food. The…
Continue Reading Consumer-Funded Test Finds 11 of 12 Pet Foods Contaminated