White House Turns Down Raw Milk Petition
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »Move on, folks. There is no news here.
We expected the crony-capitalist-in-Chief to side with the people with the most money. Their scientific argument was a lie. There was no mention of the health benefits of raw milk in the WH's reply. My son no longer has allergies thanks to raw milk.
Love the part about 143 illness outbreaks in the last 25 years.
How may case did we have with processed, USDA inspected foods in the last 10 years?
It is all about SHOW ME THE MONEY.
Good decision.
For once the whackos aren't having a say in the laws of the land.
Rick asks: How may case did we have with processed, USDA inspected foods in the last 10 years?
One has to look at the number of cases per items consumed. If raw milk is 1:5,000 and pasteurized milk 1: 5,000,000 that means the odds of getting sick from raw milk are 1000x that of pasteruized milk. But if 2000x as many people drink pasteurized milk the number becoming ill from pasteruized milk would be 2x that for raw milk.
But the chances of a person getting ill from drinking raw milk is still 1000x that for pasteurized milk.
(Numbers for illustration purposes only)
So Rick, drink it yourself, but if you give it to your kid and he dies I am voting for a voluntary manslaughter conviction.
Hey Shelley, the "laws of the land" state that we have the right to drink raw milk (federal law supports "the importance of letting consumers control their own food choices" and "has never taken, nor does it intend to take action against individual consumers").
This is an instance where I'd prefer to see federal trump state, but oh well.