Can a Sustainable Walmart Change the World?
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Sustainability »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Sustainability »It is easy to see that this is nothing more that Walmart's latest salvo in its strategy to co-opt the terms "local" and "sustainable." The place to start is by reading the entire press release linked above at http://walmartstores.com/pressroom/news/10376.aspx.
To understand this has little to do with American production, one need only notice how little American farmers are mentioned in the press release.
Then consider the meaning of the first of the 4 points in the press release, “ By the end of 2015 in emerging markets, Walmart will help many small and mid-sized farmers gain access to markets by: selling $1 billion in food sourced from 1 million small and medium farmers." [The emphasis is mine.]
First, what is meant by “emerging markets?” Though the term is never defined or even mentioned again, it is clear from the rest of the press release that Walmart’s focus is sourcing overseas.
Then notice that it says “selling” food worth $1 billion. Is that retail or Walmart’s cost? If we give Walmart the benefit of the doubt and say it means Walmart will pay the $1 billion to farmers. That is $1,000,000,000 spread across 1,000,000 farmers or an average of just $1,000 per farmer!
And how much will it cost those farmers to be able to interface with Walmart’s procurement system? As everyone growing produce knows the requirements to sell to a company like Walmart are huge. And Walmart won’t buy it in $1,000 increments. The only way that can be done is by the small and medium farmers banding together in co-operative packing, marketing and distribution systems which are expensive to operate.
I would say that this is nothing more than “putting lipstick on a pig” but to do so would insult the pig.
To accomplish this goal,WalMart,the company wants to sell $1 billion in food sourced from 1 million small and medium farmers in emerging markets, provide training and infrastructure to 1 million farmers and farm workers in such things as crop selection and sustainable farming practices, and increase the income of the small and medium farmers it sources from by 10 to 15 percent.
Since a traceback database will be needed if Walmart is serious about food safety that runs in all of the countries listed in the above story as would the certification costs would have to be cut by 75%, or will Walmart just pay more for the produce and cut their own profits?
Let me get this straight -- a credible retail entity undertakes to move one billion (that's one billion, with a B!) dollars worth of product from "local, sustainable" growers...this retailer, WalMart, isn't bluffing - they've consistently followed through on published intentions in the past - and what is the response of the self-annointed spokespeople of "local, sustainable farmers" here on Food Safety News? Well, they doubt and gripe and complain, of course -- they always do, always. They claim to be prematurely worried about their grubby profit margins, again, as usual.
Sorta looks like the vocal uber-trendy hobby farmers are about to have their bluff uncovered. They've prattled on and on about their prowess as growers, blathered on and on about the imagined safety and superiority of their fabled magical produce and now, finally, just when they get their big chance to 'really go to town' (quite literally) they choke. So, what are you afraid of...success?
About to be exposed as dreamers, imposters and prevaricators...but of the very, very finest local sort, of course.
To a certain extent, Walmart's entry into any popular trend is inevitable - they're a freakin' force of nature, and they can do good things... For example, the South Side of Chicago is one of the country's largest "food deserts" as a result of idiotic/corrupt governance that had made it impossible to open a decent grocery store. The city council FINALLY dropped objections to Walmart building stores here, and they are already planning on building dozens of grocery stores, many of those in the areas that don't have anywhere to buy fresh produce within two miles.
I think if Walmart labels their food truthfully, and in a way that allows people to conduct research on the provenance of the food, this could be a very good thing. Who knows if they will, though. If they don't, though, they won't get much traction with people willing to pay more for traceable food.
Sadly, WalMart's history suggests that they will develop exclusive partnership with growers (here or abroad) then, after the growers have severed all existing commercial ties, will demand that WalMart's cost for the same product be significantly reduced. Having lost their previous commercial relationships, growers will be forced to bend to WalMart's will.
I should have read more carefully. If they're talking about sourcing food from small famers in Africa, and then shipping it over here, that's most definately not "local" in any meaningful way, and they're missing the point. I imagine they might be doing both - sourcing food from small farmers internationally, and from farms near the physical stores.
In any event, people who are serious about sustainable agriculture are pretty jaded when it comes to that kind of labeling. "USDA Organic" used to usually mean sustainable, but no longer does, just like "free range" used to mean pastured, but no longer does. We'll investigate their claims before paying twice as much for a given food item. I'm sure they'd fool a lot of gullible people just by stamping the word "local" on it, though - just like they use the terms "Heart-Healthy" and "Diet" in completely meaningless ways.
OK you Walmart haters, I'm going to drop a bomb on you. In our market in the midwest you can already get more locally grown and produced food at Walmart than you can at Whole Foods. I haven't a clue as to why someone would want to ship milk products into WI or wheat products into MN but they do. I think it's great that consumers are paying more attention to where the food that they eat comes from and how it is produced. This is good for our farmers markets, good for our local co-ops, good for Walmart and good for us.