Del Monte Sues FDA Over Cantaloupe Recall, Import Restrictions
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Foodborne Illness Investigations »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Foodborne Illness Investigations »Interesting article. Del Monte suggests that Salmonella could have come from the retail level. No doubt the good folks at Del Monte already know that retailers take the view that food safety is the manufacturer's problem and that the retailer's only function is to sell product. I don't know of even one food retailer who feels that safety testing of the product they sell is any concern of theirs. Is there anyone out there in CyberLand able to contradict that statement by citing a retailer who does have a policy of testing the product for sale in their stores? If so, I would like to hear about it.
I can’t wait to see this hit the box office…
Jessep (FDA): You want answers?!
Kaffee (Del Monte Attorney): I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with petri dishes. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom!...
Kaffee: Did you order the Melon Recall?
Jessep: I did the job that—-
Kaffee: Did you order the Melon Recall?!
Jessep: You're G—D--- right I did!!
In June of 2009 I attended the AOAC annual meeting, which took place in Rockville, Maryland. I attended a session on fresh produce and food safety; one of the speakers was a corporate officer from Dole, who was responsible for product quality, including Dole’s melon operation.
Essentially, Dole has contract farmers throughout Central America who supply the company with melons year-round. Most of the melons arrive in the US via the port of New Orleans. Dole maintains some oversight of the grower’s operations in C. America through on-site audits and the use of HACCP. Growers who are not compliant run the risk of Dole canceling their contract.
But the Dole rep giving the presentation stated that his company does not do ANY testing of its melons for enteric pathogens. His explanation: with Dole importing thousands of melons every month, only a tiny, tiny fraction can be tested, and what kind of conclusions can be made with confidence about the safety of the melons based on such minute sampling stats ? If indeed a subset of melons were assayed and found to have no enteric pathogens on them, can Dole state with confidence that the remaining melons in that lot / shipment are free of enteric pathogens as well ?
The logic of this explanation is of course open to debate. Is a little testing better than no testing at all ? As it stands, I think Dole’s attitude is deliberately reliant on the philosophy of Ignorance is Bliss; “ if we don’t test, then we don’t run the risk of finding something nasty that would complicate our operation”.
The retailer has no clue what he is receiving and under which conditions the product was raised and handled. In order to solve this problem complete documentation moving with the product as provided by ScoringAg.com is needed. With human and machine readable labels containing the important information as required by FDA since July 3, 2011 and traceback in seconds throughout the supply helps the retailer and consumer in events like this.
If federal microbiologist's depiction of Del Monte's position on testing is accurate, than it also might discredit two of the contentions Del Monte presents in the suit.
"Results of FDA's tests of cantaloupes from the Asuncion Mita farm -- in January just before reports of illnesses surfaced and in April, after the outbreak was reported -- were negative for Salmonella."
"FDA and other public health officials concluded that the outbreak illnesses were associated with eating cantaloupes "without ever testing any cantaloupes to determine whether they contained Salmonella.""
Claiming that FDA's testing or lack thereof is pivotal seems counter to any corporate policy of foregoing testing due to concerns surrounding testing effectiveness in identifying contamination in product.
From my perspective, saying "We don't test, because it's not reliable," and "You should have proved this through testing," sounds hypocritical.
Yeah, this is quite the procedural turn-around. Ordinarily it is the lunatic fringe filing frivolous lawsuits against USDA/FDA criticizing their conclusions and challenging their testing protocols...like for alfalfa...sugar beets...salmon...most anything modern and progressive.
Amusing how this litigious approach (straight out of the activist's playbook) is suddenly frowned upon and recognized as "hypocritical". The rare fleeting lucid moment does occur.
Oh, well. Carry on, campers!