Header graphic for print

Food Safety News

Breaking news for everyone's consumption

Rocky Mountain High: Marijuana Industry Push Back on More Rules

The powerful Colorado Cannabis Chamber of Commerce “[has] not and will not” endorse the latest proposed changes to the state ‘s edible marijuna regulations that call for the placement of a “THC Stop Sign” on each pot-infused package and marijuana serving.

A Cannabis Chamber spokesman told Food Safety News the marijuana industry group cannot go along with the “stop sign logo as we believe it is sending a political message to stop THC.”

Almost two years ago, when Colorado became the first state to make recreational marijuana use legal, it led to the birth of a booming new industry that infuses food and beverages with marijuana. The state currently has 134 manufacturers licensed to make “infused” food and beverage products.

marijuana-infused-food-406Those products account for about half of all legal retail marijuana sales. Those sales just topped $50 million for June, but they’ve also turned out to be something of a Rubik’s cube for state marijuana regulators.

Since marijuana prohibition ended, state lawmakers have kept the pressure on regulations to make edibles easily identifiable — even outside their packaging.

Last year’s idea called for using the familiar marijuana weed symbol to mark the packaging and all the servings. Parents said the weed symbol would make edibles too attractive for children.

THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, is one of more than 60 active ingredients in cannabis, but it is the one responsible for the high that gets “baked” into all those food and beverage products. That’s why the “THC Stop Sign” is a non-starter with industry.

Other potential new rules being floated by the Marijuana Enforcement Division (MED) in the state’s Department of Revenue include prohibiting edibles from being labeled as “candy,” requiring edibles to be “made from scratch,” and implementing standard measurement procedures.

The stop sign markings would be required on individual pieces or servings, not just the outside packaging. Beverages would be limited to single servings with 10 milligrams of THC each.

Diane Carlson, spokesperson for the parent group known as Smart Colorado, praised the proposals, saying they would allow children and teenagers “to know when and if marijuana is in a food, candy or soda.” Smart Colorado wants “the state to implement the proposed rules as quickly as possible,” according to Carlson.

The MED has set aside both Aug. 31 and Sept. 1 as public hearing time to take testimony on permanent marijuana rules.

Last year, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) said product packaging labeling, child-resistant packaging and the ability to protect edibles in production, storage and transportation from foodborne pathogens all had to be addressed.

The initiative that made marijuana legal in Colorado limits its regulation to the Department of Revenue. CDPHE is one of about 20 “stakeholders” that the MED has invited to participate in the marijuana rule-making.

Johnny Green, Oregon marijuana activist and author of The Weed Blog, wrote Thursday about the push-back by the Cannabis Chamber “against a culture of dangerous potential overregulation of legal cannabis edibles in Colorado.”

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

© Food Safety News
  • Brenda Marshall

    I believe there should be some way to help detour the appearance of marijuana products from children. It has been on my mind for a long time, prior to this discussion.
    Koodos to the mothers in Colorado. It’s not about trying to make it illegal, it’s about protecting children. I wouldn’t want to see my child on a marijuana high from eating a “YUMMY” looking package of brownies. As with any major change to our country’s system there should be more thought put into things.

  • Miles Monroe

    (Not Very) Smart Colorado has been fighting cannabis re-normalization from the very beginning, starting with the campaign to enact Amendment 64, and since it passed they’ve been doing everything they can to impede its implementation, and all with the same erroneous, deceptive, and ridiculously irrational Reefer Madness claims and assertions; they illustrate more than anything else just how many ignorant people have been deluded into supporting their own enslavement by exploiting a fear and prejudice against anything or anyone portrayed as “different than us”.

  • echolele

    How about people use that lump a couple feet above their ass, and only take what their tolerance can handle.

  • Lightpaws Hird

    How about you all conform to Federal Laws and make it Illegal again as it is suppose to be. I don’t support the legalization and I think Colorado needs to be punished by the Federal Government for this.

    • Bryan

      Marijuana is schedule I. Cocaine and meth are schedule II. Make sense? Of course not.
      So, let’s put a Mr. Yuck sticker on edibles. Keep them in child-proof containers, like the other drugs that are prescribed. The real problem in this country is all of the over-prescribed drugs that fall into kids hands. Kids die from O.D.ing on these drugs.
      http://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/05/illegal-marijuana-deaths-compared.png
      Marijuana is quantifiably less addictive than cigarettes or alcohol.
      Plenty of things that impair judgment are nonetheless legal, most notably alcohol.
      Nobody has ever died from a marijuana overdose, unlike cigarettes, alcohol, and prescription pills.
      Health organizations across the world have voiced support for marijuana’s medicinal properties.
      Synthetic marijuana substitutes lack CBD, a key element in marijuana’s therapeutic properties.
      There is no association whatsoever between marijuana use and lung cancer.
      Federal drug laws are inconsistent and illogical across the board.
      http://www.bustle.com/articles/16467-how-to-argue-for-weed-7-arguments-against-marijuana-legalization-debunked

  • Stan Denver

    I like the idea of having
    clear identification but a Stop sign may not be the best insignia as I equate
    it with danger. Labeling similar to alcohol is sufficient since in no manner is
    it reasonable to have marijuana classified as more dangerous than alcohol,