On Wednesday, 96 farm, ranch, consumer, rural, labor and faith-based groups sent a letter to conferees expressing opposition to a recent proposal that the “born, raised and slaughtered” production-step labels be replaced with a “product of USA” and “product of North America” label.
“This labeling scheme fails to remedy the critique of the WTO dispute panels because it would perpetuate consumer deception, as the United States is part of North America, and would still require meatpackers to keep all-American born and raised livestock separate from livestock born and/or raised in Canada or Mexico,” the letter read.
The groups, which include the Consumer Federation of America, R-CALF USA, Food & Water Watch and the National Family Farm Coalition, additionally argued that changes to COOL should be made by a public conference committee vote rather than in closed-door conference committee negotiations.
“Any changes to country of origin labeling should occur in full view of the American public with ample debate and recorded votes,” they wrote.
National Farmers Union President Roger Johnson also sent a letter to the conferees repeating the organization’s priorities for the bill and stating that COOL should not be changed.
“If any harmful changes to COOL are included in the farm bill, it could very likely affect NFU’s ability to support the entire farm bill,” Johnson said.
That position was echoed by the 96 groups, which agreed that many COOL advocates would oppose a farm bill with a North American or NAFTA-meat label.© Food Safety News