Header graphic for print

Food Safety News

Breaking news for everyone's consumption

IOM: FDA’s Inspection Approach to Imports is ‘Impractical’

An increasing portion of the food on our plate is coming from beyond our borders, but how do we know that it’s safe? A new study by the Institute of Medicine looks at the “daunting” task of ensuring safe food across the globe and comes to the conclusion that it’s going to take lot more than random, infrequent inspections.

The flood of imported food and drugs is putting a lot of stress on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the agency charged with overseeing the safety of food, drugs, cosmetics and medical devices. The volume of imported FDA-regulated products has tripled over the last decade, increasing by 13 percent each year since 2002. Now an estimated 40 percent of fruits and nuts and 85 percent of seafood consumed in the United States is imported.

cargo-ship2-iphone.jpgThe IOM suggests that FDA’s traditional method of trying to keep a handle on food and product safety by making periodic inspections is impractical because 20 million types of FDA-regulated foods arrive from more than 300,000 factories in 150 different countries.

Instead, the committee suggests FDA use enterprise risk management — which aggregates risk information across all products to analyze threats — to guide the agency’s efforts. The panel also recommends that FDA use it’s reputation and expertise to help developing countries build their own capacity to regulate food and drugs.

“These partnerships should involve other regulatory agencies, foundations and other donors, universities, international organizations, and non-governmental organizations, such as consumer and industry groups,” reads the study. “One priority for the FDA and its international partners should be to expand education and training about regulatory science and policy in countries that are high-volume exporters of high-risk goods to the U.S. market.”

The committee notes that the globalization of food and drugs presents a unique challenge to regulators and consumers alike: “International trade can turn the product safety failures of the poorest countries into liabilities for the richest ones.”

The report comes just weeks after the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a review that suggests outbreaks tied to imported foods are increasing.

Of course, moving forward on the IOM’s recommendations takes time, staff, and resources, which FDA and its allies are fighting for as discretionary spending gears up for another tough budget battle.

 

© Food Safety News
  • doc raymond

    The IOM report seems to lead one to believe that if we could only better regulate the safety of imported foods, we would stay healthy. And it calls the task “daunting”. I think that before FDA tries to increase its efforts internationally, as suggested by the report, perhaps FDA should try and better prevent the next cantaloupe based outbreak, get rid of the Peanut Corporation of America type disasters and their flagrant attempts to get around safety issues, find a way to keep E coli out of raw cookie dough, find a better way to grow sprouts and be able tell me my leafy greens won’t kill me. Easy to point the finger at imports, but even easier to point it back at ourselves.
    By the way, the “daunting” task is handled quite well by the USDA/FSIS. Nearly all meat and poultry coming into the US is reinspected, and the exporting countries have an in-country audit of their meat and poultry safety systems almost every year.

  • David Wangbichler

    Any food imported should be inspected to US standards. Put the cost on the companies exporting to us. Since when did the US Government not want to have a buracracy?