Indiana, Iowa Stir Raw Milk Debate
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Food Policy & Law »Look at the reported illnesses from consuming raw milk and then look at how many are in children under the age of 18. How will these bills protect children from their parents' choices?
Wow, That is pretty presumptious. We do not need food police. We need to be better informed. Westonaprice.org is a great place to start. You think that Big Dairy is really concerned about the liability of the little farmer? They are so sweet to protect the little guy-Not. They are pushing for small farm raids. Pasteurization is a way for the Industrial food system to keep making a dirty product and then sterilize it so it is 'safe'. The problem is that it destroys so much that is good about milk, like enzymes (lactose), and good bacteria lactobacilli which are necessary for helthy digestive tracts. Parents who give their kids raw dairy are some of the most informed parents I know. You don't find doritos or soda in their houses, but the FDA calls that food and Raw Dairy 'unsafe' - give me a break. Please who ever you are don't presume you could raise my kids better than I. And certainly don't expect the gov't to do a better job. Once they take away my freedom and have control over my body, they get yours too.
@MaryG
1) Lactose is not an enzyme, it's a sugar.
2) Lactose is not destroyed by pasteurization.
I hope you’re not counting yourself as one of those “informed consumers.”
@Elivaa
MaryG probably meant lactase, which is destroyed by pasteurization. Many people who are lactose intolerant are able to drink and even thrive on raw milk because lactase is in the milk and helps assimilate the lactose.
Thank you Peter, yes I did mean lactase. I should slow down when I type. But just like people who cannot make an argument to find those things and exploite them. Elivaa, hope you care enough about your health to find the truth.
"researchers acknowledge they couldn't prove causation" ... what a concept!
let's see that same cautious logic, rather than being so quick off the mark to blame a farm producing REAL MILK for human consumption, at rumors of local illness
Growing up in SD I remember once a week I would go with my Mother to a farm that milled cows. We would take our empty jugs and fill them from the bulk tank, leave some money on the ledge and take our "illegal" milk home. Our whole family drank it for year no as far as I can remember no one was sickened by it. If you don't want to drink raw milk fine; just don't tell me that I can't.
Stanford did a case-control study (funded by raw milk advocates) and discovered that most of the volunteers who thought they were lactose intolerant weren't -- their digestive problems related to milk were all imaginary -- so they couldn't be used in the research.
Among those genuinely lactose-intolerant individuals eventually chosen to participate in the study, none could tolerate raw milk any more than they could pasteurized milk.
http://www.realrawmilkfacts.com/PDFs/RawMilkPoster14Oct10-1.pdf
For those of you who follow the Weston A Price Foundation, read their disclaimer on their website:
Neither the Weston A. Price Foundation nor any of its affiliates or their respective stockholders, members, directors, officers, employees or agents (the “Weston A. Price Foundation parties”) guarantees the accuracy, adequacy, timeliness, reliability, completeness, or usefulness of any of the content of this website.