Header graphic for print

Food Safety News

Breaking news for everyone's consumption

Election Unlikely to Change S. 510 Fate in Senate

Though Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives, Democrats maintained narrow control of the Senate in Tuesday’s midterm election, a reality that will likely not impact the fate of the pending FDA Food Safety Modernization Act slated for a cloture vote during the lame duck session in November.

At press time, Senate Democrats were poised to hold 49 seats, Republicans held 46, Independents 2, while 3 remained in play as election returns rolled in on the West Coast. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), who scheduled the beleaguered food safety bill for a cloture vote before recess, kept his seat in what proved to be a very tumultuous campaign cycle.

With limited upheaval in the Senate, it is likely that the food safety bill will remain on track to pass in the upper chamber.  Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), chair of the Senate Health, Education, and Labor Committee and an avid supporter of the legislation, recently told reporters he believes he has over 90 yes votes for the bill.

“I remain optimistic that regardless of the outcome of the election, S. 510 will be taken up by the Senate when they return,” Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told Food Safety News, before the final returns were reported.

Whether the bill makes it through a conference committee and to the President’s desk before the new year is another question.

“I frankly don’t think it will make much difference either way,” said David Acheson, former associate commissioner of foods at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “I see about a 5 percent chance [for the bill] and I suspect the election won’t change that much either way.”

The House passed its version of the food safety bill in July 2009.  After a year of debate and compromise with small, sustainable agriculture advocates, the Senate bill contains some provisions aimed to reduce the regulatory burden on small farms and food facilities. The Senate version also does not contain registration fees to help pay for the $1.4 billion measure.

It remains to be seen whether Congressional leaders will dedicate the time necessary to resolve these important differences before the new congress comes to Washington in January.

Bill Marler, leading food lawyer and publisher of Food Safety News, thinks it’s “now or never” for the bill.

“If S. 510 does not pass in the lame duck session, get reconciled with HB 2749, and get signed by the President by years end, we will not see food safety legislation again this decade,” he said.

As Robert Guenther, senior vice president of public policy at United Fresh, a produce industry trade group, explained Tuesday, regardless of legislative progress, the Obama administration will likely continue as planned on regulatory priorities, presumably including food safety in the mix.   

“As we start to take stock in what may take place next year, a quick read on tonight’s election result tells us that President Obama’s legislative agenda will be all but dead for the next two years,” wrote Guenther during the Untied Fresh’s live election blog update. “However, what we may see is an even more active regulatory agenda from the administration on policy issues that the President deems important.”

Correction: This article originally wrongly attributed Robert Guenther’s statement to Patrick Delaney of United Fresh. 

© Food Safety News
  • dangermaus

    Oh, c’mon… “If S. 510 does not pass in the lame duck session, get reconciled with HB 2749, and get signed by the President by years end, we will not see food safety legislation again this decade”? That plays into the same fallacy that there hasn’t been any food safety bills since the 1930’s. AND uses this site’s favorite tactic of scaring people into believing them!
    What a crock. We might not see a giant, massively expensive overhaul like this one, but that’s probably a good thing. Something this important should be done in small steps.

  • Waninahi

    This “bill” brings the U.S. under the Codex Alimentarius, & is NOT about “food safety”, but about FOOD CONTROL. We will HAVE to obey “worldwide regulations” & there is no calling it off once signed on. Those who support this abomination must know that the Codex, as is freely admitted, will cause the deaths of billions because of the low levels of nutrients it supports. It “regulates” organic foods & over-the-counter vitamins & supplements out of existence. ALL food will have to pass Codex guidelines, which rids us of most small farms & local produce markets. It denies Americans the right to decide for themselves what they eat, drink, or use to better their own health. This is merely a EUGENICS move for population reduction.

  • ctl

    I think the intent of the bill is to make sure the growing number of organic produce sold at farmers markets is safe and that those who profit from it are held to the same standards as the big farmers. I am sure some of the big food companies have money invested in passing this bill as the popularity of farmers markets have undoubtedly taken a bite out of their profits in recent years.

  • LM

    It’s all about control….of YOU!

  • CME

    The health bill had some 3,000 pages and was not even read by the majority of those voting it into law. Now, we find out that it contained a litany of laws and regulations that have nothing whatsoever to do with health care.
    Can anything that comes out of this present Democratic controlled Congress be trusted to be what it is supposed to represent? Food safety? Really, take away my right to share my food with a neighbor? Take away my right to even grow a garden? What kind of lunacy is this anyway? Food safety from guys who have never even dug in the dirt much less grow their own tomatoes.
    Unbelievable, and we keep putting these guys back in office, year after year.