In the Food Revolution, Vote with Your Fork
© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Nutrition & Public Health »© Food Safety News
More Headlines from Nutrition & Public Health »Why do Dr. Nestle and other proponents of S 510 say things like, "We have the same food safety system as in 1906 when Upton Sinclair wrote 'The Jungle’?”
This is preposterous! Other than Upton Sinclair's having written "The Jungle," everything else in that sentence is absolutely false.
Look up "The Jungle" in Wikipedia and you will learn, "the novel was first published in serial form in 1905.’After five rejections', its first edition as a novel was published by Doubleday, Page & Company on February 28, 1906, and it became an immediate bestseller and has been in print ever since."
Why does this matter? Because it provided a major push for the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act on June 30, 1906. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_Food_and_Drug_Act.)
In turn, Wikipedia tells us, "The [1906] law itself was largely replaced by the much more comprehensive Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938."
Now go to Wikepedia's entry on it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food,_Drug,_and_Cosmetic_Act. At the bottom of the box on the right side is a section entitled, "Major Amendments." It lists 12 bills passed by Congress. There were many other small changes made.
Of course some of the amendments focused on drugs and not food.
More importantly, "the food safety system" does not ONLY rely on the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). The foundation of the system also includes the Public Healthy Service Act of 1944 (PHSA). In fact, the FDA asserted the huge authority of the PHSA recently in defending against a lawsuit by the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF). Sec III A, The PHSA and the Interstate Ban of Unpasteurized Milk on p. 5 is a good starting point.
Despite all of this readily accessible rebuttal of what they declare, Dr. Nestle and the Make Our Food Safe Coalition would have us believe that Federal regulation of food has NOT been "modernized" in over a hundred years.
I agree with Dr. Nestle, "This is a place where we need advocacy" but the advocacy we need is based upon the truth not falsehoods.
"Vote with Your Fork" is the perfect solution - absolutely perfect.
If you don't care for a food, don't buy it and don't eat it. But also, don't needlessly bash it or make up silly falsehoods crusading for some dreamy elitist 'alternative' to be imposed upon the rest of us. If you prefer to eat some esoteric food of dubious origin and safety, privately seek it out, document its provenance to your heart's content, pay the premium and quietly indulge yourself. Otherwise let the rest of the planet manage its global food supply sensibly, scientifically, safely and affordably.
By all means be a finicky eater, if that pleases you, and leave the rest of us common mortals to live and eat as we please without the insipid orthorexic opinions, without the lame prosyletizing and, especially, without the ridiculous unwarranted health scares and enviro-guilt trips calculated to suck the enjoyment out of ordinary life. Live an' let live...won't be no trouble that way.
Just vote with your fork and leave it at that, thanks. Common sense and capitalism will take care of the rest.
Here are some interview excerpts from when the FDA went after Cheerios: http://bit.ly/aKV4gv