Header graphic for print

Food Safety News

Breaking news for everyone's consumption

JBS Unit Again Recalls Banned Beef from Brazil

With JBS, SA, the largest beef company on the planet based in Brazil, and Sampco Inc., its export/import operation based in Chicago, one might think the biggest pros in the business could keep meat from one banned Brazilian processing plant from getting into the United States.

But one would be wrong.

For the third time since last May, Sampco has failed to carry out that task.   The JBS unit has been forced to undertake a third recall, this one for 258,000 pounds of cooked beef products.

And just as it did June 25, when it recalled 61,000 pounds of cooked and canned and frozen beef products, as well as last May 17, when it recalled 87,000 pounds of canned and boxed corned beef, Sampco took the action because the source of the meat was Brazilian establishment 337.

That’s the Brazilian meat processor that was delisted May 6, banned from importing to the United States because “violative levels of the animal drug Ivermectin” were found in its products.

It is a Class III recall, meaning use of the product will not cause adverse health consequences.  It is nonetheless, troublesome.

In August, Al Almanza, the top administrator at the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, caused a stir when he said the misuse of Ivermectin, a broad-based antiparasitic animal drug, is a “systematic problem” in Brazil. 


Brazil supposedly suspended its export of cooked beef products to the U.S. to give American authorities time to investigate.  While the recalls for Ivermectin have all been for the same Brazilian processing plant, unacceptable levels have been found in other facilities that ship to the US.

Food & Water Watch, the US-based environmental group, views the animal drug as an imminent public health risk.

As with the other two recalls, each product package bears “BRASIL 337 S.I.F,” as well as “Product of Brazil” or “Packed under Brazilian Government Inspection.” 

USDA’s Food Safety & Inspection Service recently found that 8 lots of product from Brazilian establishment SIF 337 have been shipped into commerce despite the firm’s ineligible status. 

Consumers who have purchased any of these products should return them to their point of purchase:

  • 12-ounce cans of “Libby Corned Beef” bearing a production code “100315U,” “100316U,” “100322U,” or “100326U.” These products were sent to distribution centers in Florida and Pennsylvania for retail sales.

  • 7-ounce pouches “Brushy Creek Shredded Beef” bearing production codes “100121,” “100128,” “100129,” “100308,” or “100322.” These products were sent to distribution centers in Missouri, New Jersey, and Ohio for retail sales.

  • 10-ounce “Brushy Creek Roast Beef” bearing production codes “100226,” “100309,” or “100311.” These products were sent to distribution centers in California, Missouri, New Jersey, and Texas for retail sales.

  • 12-ounce cans of “Kroger Corned Beef” bearing production code “100226U.”  These products were sent to distribution centers in Indiana for retail sales.  Because the health risk is said to be low, FSIS will likely not release the list of retailers involved, as the agency must do in a Class I recall.

FSIS is responsible for assuring that imported meat, poultry and egg products are safe, wholesome, unadulterated, and properly labeled and packaged. 

FSIS randomly samples products at ports for drug and chemical residues. FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. 

© Food Safety News
  • Jess C. Rajan, Ph.D.

    Chemical residue tolerances are established for “target tissues” and not for cooked/processed products. The FDA has established (21 CFR § 556.344) a chemical residue tolerance of 10 parts per billion (ppb) for 22, 23-dihydroavermectin B1a (marker residue) in cattle muscle (target) tissue. For enforcing its regulatory tolerances, the FDA also specifies official regulatory analytical methods for quantitative determination and confirmation of the “marker residues” in the “target tissues”.
    After announcing the recall (FSIS-RC-033-2010) of the cooked beef products imported from Brazil in May 2010, the FSIS updated its website in June 2010 and posted the two (FSIS) analytical methods used for the determination (R03a: CLG-AVR.03) and confirmation (R03b: CLG-AVR1.02 ) of ivermectin: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Science/Chemistry_Lab_Guidebook/index.asp
    However, these two FSIS analytical methods are not applicable for determining the amounts and confirming the identity of ivermectin residues in cooked/processed tissues. Also, the FSIS confirmatory method (CLG-AVR1.02 ) cannot reliably confirm the presence of ivermectin residues below 25 ppb in the target tissue matrices specified in 21 CFR.
    There are also other procedural inconsistencies in the FSIS sampling and analysis of food products for ivermectin. The current FSIS confirmatory method (CLG-AVR1.02, page 5) requires the use of procedural steps in a previously archived version of a determinative method (CLG-AVR.02).
    To assure food safety, both Brazil and FSIS should be testing for ivermectin in the correct (uncooked) target tissues using appropriate analytical methods that are consistent with the 21 CFR.

  • James A. Miller

    Not only am i now concernd with the health risk but as a former inmate who hasbeen suspicious of the bushy creek roast beef because it was labled “HALAL” an I had a feeling something was up. A number of Muslim inmates including myself only ate it because we thought it was halal but that is not the case. I smell a lawsuit. Do you?